Good day, all!
This is quite a valid theory for humans, and the reason I'm bringing it up here is to analyse whether the idea of death is valid for this statement itself, too. In line with the creator of the creator issue. Now let us start approaching.
1. Please note that it is meant to be about things, and time and space may be excluded. Previously, I had raised a query about time and space, and let me tell you that space may not be a property of life, or rather, not related to life, but time definitely is, as it may run fast or slow, apparently, due to one's mood swings. Clocks show the time related to celestial bodies and are not based on our own experience.
2. As I have said in a recent post, I may state that there is no pure spirituality for a conscious mind, and any level of extraspection and introspection remains within the realms of materialism. Minor variations to this can happen during meditations in Yogic culture but may be neglected. So, for one alive, one cannot go outside materialism while keeping one's persona intact. Down here, in the Hindu culture sage-like people once achieved some level of ability; the system gives a new name to them, representing their achievement, and thereby alters their persona itself. But I do not think it may really help.
3. Death really doesn't happen to living things. And death doesn't really mean total destruction of something. Any form of transformation, and, like, ideas/ rules getting obliterated by new ones. New inventions making old ones obsolete, etc. I think the point I wanted to project is quite clear, and I want you to analyse whether the statement I have mentioned as the title of the post itself had a Damocles ' sword above it.
4. Greek mythology was derived from extraspection, and Hindu mythology is more intricate and based on introspection. In both, the concept of God is very much alive, and that is why I feel that materialism and theism are mutually exclusive. They co-exist. And the term God is a tough nut to crack, and just following scriptures written years ago may not help you on the way. With the progress of material science so far, miracles alone can not be sufficient as an identity proof. Panacea and elixir are very much in the pipeline, if I had read it right! Let's add one more thing and pause. Hinduism, in its four Vedas, deals with four Yugas, and total destruction occurs at the end of Kali Yuga, and then everything restarts. Surprisingly, 8 people remain alive or rather, come back to the new one, and I am still confused about the total destruction.
The idea behind taking up this post is to say that the laws/ rules said in such scriptures may become invalid over a period of time. As the element of death or something similar is unavoidable, my worry is how this statement can remain external to all we perceive!
More later...

